In a recent podcast episode, Joe Rogan has stirred up controversy with his remarks on President Joe Biden’s health and public appearances. Known for his often provocative commentary, Rogan took aim at the President, questioning the authenticity of Biden’s public appearances and even suggesting the possibility of a “fake” Biden.

Rogan began by showing a video clip of President Biden walking up the stairs of Air Force One. In the clip, Rogan noted that Biden appeared to move with an unusual level of energy, which he found concerning. “Can we talk about just how objectively insane this is?” Rogan asked, highlighting the debate surrounding Biden’s health and questioning the reality of his public appearances.

He went on to express disbelief that discussions about Biden’s vitality had become so prominent, suggesting that a significant number of people were treating these concerns as normal. Rogan’s commentary included a sarcastic remark about “fake Biden” and urged his audience to scrutinize the footage as if it were the Patterson-Gimlin Bigfoot film—a famous piece of footage that has long been debated in terms of its authenticity.

Rogan’s skepticism extended to the physical appearance and behavior of Biden, whom he described as potentially not being the person he appears to be. He pointed out aspects of Biden’s appearance, such as his hands, and implied that they seemed too youthful to belong to the President, further fueling his conspiracy-laden narrative.

The podcast host’s remarks have drawn criticism from various quarters. Critics argue that Rogan’s suggestions are not only baseless but also contribute to a harmful culture of misinformation. By questioning the legitimacy of Biden’s health and public appearances, Rogan has intensified ongoing debates about the President, often crossing the line into speculation and conspiracy theories.

Rogan’s commentary highlights a broader trend of public figures and media personalities scrutinizing and often questioning the health and authenticity of political leaders. As such discussions continue, they raise important questions about the nature of political discourse and the impact of speculative narratives on public trust.