In a recent, shocking development, Thomas Matthew Crook, the alleged shooter in the assassination attempt on a former president, remains the center of intense scrutiny. With the investigation ongoing, the Crook family has opted for silence, leaving many questions unanswered.

Family’s Stance:

When approached for comments, Crook’s parents, Matthew and Mary, maintained a strict no-comment stance. They have requested privacy during this challenging time, stating, “We just want to try to take care of ourselves right now. So please give us our space.”

It has been reported that the Crook family initially contacted the police hours before the shooting, expressing concern over their son’s disappearance and welfare. However, it remains unclear if they were aware of his possession of the AR-15 rifle registered to his father. Both Matthew and Mary Crook are licensed professional counselors in Pennsylvania, adding another layer of complexity to the situation.

Revelations and Speculations:

Recent updates reveal that Crook’s father did know about the rifle, as this knowledge was cited as a reason for their call to the police. It was initially assumed that the call was related to a missing person’s report, but the missing rifle added a significant element to their concern.

Fox News Digital previously reported on this matter, shedding light on the family’s interactions with law enforcement. Despite their insistence on not making public statements, the situation continues to evolve.

Timeline of Events:

The timeline of Crook’s activities has been detailed through various sources, including notable commentators. Joe Rogan and Tucker Carlson have presented differing aspects of the case:

• Joe Rogan’s Findings:
  Rogan discussed information suggesting Crook had multiple visits from a mysterious figure, with connections to locations near FBI offices. The discussion touched upon the use of mobile ad data for tracking, which raised questions about privacy and security.

• Tucker Carlson’s Investigation:
  Carlson provided a detailed timeline of Crook’s activities on the day of the incident. He highlighted Crook’s purchase of a ladder, his positioning at the event site, and the use of a drone. Carlson’s report emphasized the sophisticated nature of Crook’s preparation and questioned the effectiveness of security measures.

  

Public Reaction and Next Steps:

The controversy surrounding Crook’s actions and the response from his family have led to widespread debate. The intricacies of the case continue to unfold, with ongoing investigations and public scrutiny. As the situation develops, further statements from the Crook family or official channels may provide additional insights.

For now, the Crook family remains firm in their request for privacy, leaving many questions unanswered as the investigation progresses.