(VIDEO) Wendy Williams’ Ex-Husband, Kevin Hunter Wants Divorce OVERTURNED Citing FRAUD & Hidden $48 MILLION! – KBE

Kelvin Hunter’s latest legal move to vacate his divorce from Wendy Williams is a shocking development. If successful, this would not only mean that their divorce judgment would be set aside, but technically, they could be considered married again. The driving force behind this move seems to be Kelvin’s financial struggles after Wendy’s conservatorship (referred to as a guardianship in New York) resulted in the cessation of his spousal support.

The core of his claim is based on allegations of fraud, misrepresentation, and misconduct during their divorce, pointing to a significant discrepancy in Wendy’s financial statements. According to court documents, Wendy’s best friend, Regina, claimed Wendy had $55 million in assets as of 2022, while her Wells Fargo portfolio in 2019 reflected only around $7 million. Kelvin argues that the missing $48 million was fraudulently concealed during the divorce proceedings.

Wendy’s guardian, Sabrina Morisy, is pushing back against these claims, asserting that Kelvin was fully aware of the couple’s financial situation at the time of the divorce and has no grounds to reopen the case. Kelvin’s desperation, however, is evident in his continuous legal maneuvers to regain spousal support, as he claims to be in financial distress, unable to pay for his housing and healthcare.

The complexity of this case extends beyond just the financial aspect. Wendy’s guardianship introduces legal questions about who has the authority to represent her in court, especially since the guardianship is based in New York, while the divorce proceedings are in New Jersey. If the divorce is vacated, it’s unclear what implications this would have on Wendy’s guardianship or if Kelvin would have any increased influence over her affairs.

As this legal battle unfolds, the outcome could potentially reshape the future of both Wendy Williams and Kelvin Hunter’s lives, with far-reaching financial and personal implications. The public, as well as legal experts, will undoubtedly continue to watch this case closely for any new developments.