In a recent appearance on Joe Rogan’s podcast, evolutionary psychologist Gad Saad delved into what he terms “suicidal empathy”—a phenomenon he believes is increasingly pervasive in Western societies. Saad’s insights, discussed over the course of the interview, highlighted how this empathy misfire is shaping immigration policies and societal responses, drawing considerable attention and sparking debate.
Saad began by pointing out the inherent problem in discerning the true intentions of immigrants, noting, “We don’t have the machine that can look into your heart and mind.” This statistical gamble, as Saad put it, underscores the challenges Western countries face in differentiating between immigrants who genuinely seek to integrate and those who might bring detrimental baggage. The conversation veered into the effects of mass immigration in countries like Germany, France, and Denmark, with Saad questioning why these nations are experiencing such significant immigration-related issues.
Rogan and Saad discussed how the concept of empathy has evolved for clear evolutionary reasons, serving as a mechanism for social cohesion and support. However, Saad argued that empathy can become detrimental when misdirected or hyperactive. He cited policies that prioritize illegal immigrants over American veterans as examples of this misfire. According to Saad, this misplaced empathy has led to “insane policies” and societal strain, driven by the Western ethos of kindness, tolerance, and compassion.
The conversation also touched on the broader implications of this empathetic approach, with Saad explaining that the Western mindset often leads to noble but impractical policies. “The reflex is a noble one,” he acknowledged, referring to the desire to help those less fortunate. However, he emphasized that this idealistic approach can exist in a “unicorn world” detached from practical realities.
Rogan echoed Saad’s sentiments, noting that the repercussions of such policies are now evident in the United States, mirroring the social issues seen in Europe. He highlighted the importance of addressing these challenges before they become unmanageable, suggesting that the West’s emphasis on tolerance and empathy has, in some cases, led to its own detriment.
Saad referenced the Cloward-Piven strategy, a socio-political theory from the 1960s aimed at overloading public welfare systems to precipitate a crisis and force governmental change. He proposed that the current immigration policies might be inadvertently—or deliberately—following this blueprint. By overwhelming financial and social services, societies could be driven towards a systemic breakdown, necessitating new forms of governance.
In conclusion, Saad and Rogan’s discussion underscored a critical perspective on Western immigration policies and the broader societal implications of what Saad terms “suicidal empathy.” The conversation highlighted the need for a balanced approach that considers both compassion and practicality, ensuring that policies do not lead to unintended and detrimental consequences. As the debate on immigration continues to evolve, Saad’s insights offer a provocative lens through which to examine the complexities of empathy and policy-making in the modern world.