Terrence recently shared his experience of presenting unconventional scientific ideas to the acclaimed astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, only to face intense scrutiny and eventual dismissal. His story highlights the challenges and frustrations of advocating for groundbreaking theories that challenge established scientific norms.
Terrence embarked on his journey by creating physical representations of his theories, which he believed addressed fundamental flaws in conventional science. His work, encapsulated in a 36-page treatise, aimed to question and redefine basic concepts, such as the nature of multiplication and the existence of straight lines.
“These are all physical representations that I’ve created,” Terrence explained. “I started with the idea that our fundamentals are a little bit off, there are no straight lines.”
Terrence first met Tyson at an event and was encouraged by Tyson’s openness to his ideas. “He was like, ‘Hey man, yeah, I’d love for you to come on my show, do my radio, do my TV thing,'” Terrence recounted. “I had something I wanted to introduce to him.”
Terrence sent his 36-page document to Tyson, emphasizing its controversial nature. The treatise included wave conjugations and a provocative mathematical assertion: “1 times 1 equals 2.” Tyson responded with rigorous critique, redlining the document and challenging Terrence’s references to figures like Walter Russell, Victor Schauberger, John Keely, and Nikola Tesla.
“He attacked that I had mentioned Walter Russell, Victor Schauberger, and Tesla as inspirations,” Terrence said. “But then he started attacking the idea that 1 times 1 could equal 2.”
Central to Tyson’s critique was Terrence’s unconventional approach to multiplication. Terrence questioned why multiplication, which implies an increase, should result in one times one equaling one. “I argued that multiplication should mean to make more and increase in number,” he said. “How is 1 times 1 equaling 1 part of the multiplication table?”
Tyson’s critique extended to the scientific figures Terrence admired. “Tesla’s work was groundbreaking but often overlooked,” Terrence noted. “Tyson seemed to prefer more established figures like Bohr or Feynman.”
Terrence believed his work contributed to the search for a grand unified theory, a concept popularized by Giordano Bruno and later sought by many scientists, including Carl Sagan. “I told Tyson that I believed I had found this grand unified theory,” Terrence said. “His response was dismissive, and he suggested I seek other opinions.”
Following Tyson’s critique, Terrence felt isolated and discouraged. Tyson’s refusal to engage further left Terrence feeling that his groundbreaking ideas were being ignored. “When he wrote his response, he said, ‘If you have any other questions, you’re going to have to see somebody else,'” Terrence recalled. “And he wouldn’t take my calls anymore.”
Undeterred, Terrence decided to compile his experiences and ideas into a book, hoping to reach a wider audience and find other scientists willing to consider his theories. He reached out to Dr. David Tong, another prominent figure in the field, to continue his quest for recognition and validation.
“The reason I wanted to talk to him was because of his show, ‘Cosmos,'” Terrence explained. “The first episode talked about Giordano Bruno searching for the grand unified field equation. And I’m like, dude, I’ve done it, I’ve got it here.”
Terrence’s story highlights the difficulties faced by those who challenge conventional scientific wisdom. His interaction with Neil deGrasse Tyson underscores the rigorous scrutiny unconventional ideas must endure. Despite facing criticism and dismissal, Terrence remains committed to advocating for his theories, believing that open dialogue and critical examination are essential for scientific progress. His experience serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining an open mind in the pursuit of knowledge.
